Updates to Qualified Small Business Stock and R&E Expensing Under OBBBA

In episode 38 of How Tax Works, Matt Foreman discusses the updates and modifications to Qualified Small Business Stock (IRC 1202) and R&E Expensing (IRC 174) Under OBBBA, plus a bonus discussion of how he thinks OBBBA should be pronounced.

How Tax Works, hosted by Falcon Rappaport & Berkman LLP Partner Matthew E. Foreman, Esq., LL.M., delves into the intricacies of taxation, breaking down complex concepts for a clearer understanding of how tax laws impact your financial decisions.

Follow us on Bluesky:
@howtaxworks.bsky.social

This podcast may be considered attorney advertising. This podcast is not presented for purposes of legal advice or for providing a legal opinion. Before any of the presenting attorneys can provide legal advice to any person or entity, and before an attorney-client relationship is formed, that attorney must have a signed fee agreement with a client setting forth the firm’s scope of representation and the fees that will be charged. 

This Podcast is Hosted by:
Falcon Rappaport & Berkman LLP
1185 Avenue of the Americas, Suite 1415
New York, NY 10036
(212) 203 -3255
info@frblaw.com

Transcript

Matthew Foreman [00:00:07]:
Welcome to the 38th episode of How Tax Works. I'm Matt Foreman. In this episode, I'm going to discuss updates and changes to qualified small business stock, the exclusion for qualified small business stock under Section 1202 of the Internal Revenue Code, and R&E expensing under 174 and now 174 cap A of the Internal Revenue Code under Public Law 119-21-2010. Uh, which I refer to as OB Thrice. How Tax Works is meant for informational and entertainment purposes only. This may be attorney advertising, and it is not legal advice. Please, please, please hire your own attorney. Please hire your own attorney.

Matthew Foreman [00:00:44]:
Um, How Tax Works is intended to help listeners navigate the intricacies and complexities of tax law, regulations, case law, and guidance to demystify how taxes shape the financial and business decisions we all make. Administrative stuff episodes in 2 weeks. Next episode's going to talk about what you do if if, I guess when, I don't know, you get audited. I think that's an interesting one. Dropping an F-bomb, usually the first one I tell people to do, but you know, whatever, here we are. Questions, comments, or constructive criticism, email me at my FRB email address. I have some webinars coming up. They're free advanced tax strategy series.

Matthew Foreman [00:01:15]:
I've talked about it enough on this. I'm going to keep doing it. This might be the last episode before the first one. I'm not sure. I haven't totally worked out the dates yet. They're all Thursdays, 1 o'clock Eastern. So figure out what time that is local. Succession planning using profits, interest, December 4th stock sales as asset sales.

Matthew Foreman [00:01:30]:
I got to get me a really nice 338-H10 discussion. And December 18th QSBS common mistakes and misconceptions. I actually had a new one come up last week that I think is pretty interesting. But anyway, let's talk about tax, right? OB Thrice. So someone asked me why I call it OB Thrice, and the answer is very simple. I like to make pop culture references, but I also really like to make pop culture references that are not that common, I guess. And there is a rapper named Obie Thrice who is friends, friendly, I don't know, whatever, with Eminem, if you're familiar with him. And there's an episode, an episode, there's a song that starts off with, say, Obie Thrice, real name, no gimmicks.

Matthew Foreman [00:02:11]:
And so I thought this would be funny because what happened is Public Law 11921, much like basically every tax bill in the last 10, 12 years, has lost its name because it goes back and forth through the House and the Senate so much. And because of parliamentary and rule— parliamentary rules, I don't know, they lose their name. So they get these really long and weird names that, by the way, before, like, this is what the names were. They were like a description of what it is. And so they didn't have these pretty names. That's what I'm going to call it. I appreciate that it's stupid, but I think it's funny. And, you know, like I said, I say it so often, life's short.

Matthew Foreman [00:02:46]:
Let's have some fun. All right. All right. So we're going to talk about wheat, rice changes to QSBS. And R&D expensing. One thing that like I kind of want to discuss is whether it's R&D or research experimentation or R&D research development. Both 174 and 41, the tax credit, actually really call it R&D. I've always historically called it R&D.

Matthew Foreman [00:03:05]:
I started my career at Deloitte doing primarily doing R&D credits. So I call them R&D colloquially, but actually says R&D. Also the deduction under 174 says expense. It says expenditure, but but the credit under 41 calls it an expense. I'm probably just going to call it an expense even though I guess technically it's an expenditure and I'm probably going to call it R&E just because that's what the code says and I try to be consistent. All right, so Section 1202, right, exclusion for qualified small business stock. All changes for the stock are for stock that I'm just generally going to use the word received on or after July 2025. This is going to create a monstrous headache.

Matthew Foreman [00:03:43]:
Less right now, more in like 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 years. Anytime you have phase-ins, phase-outs, cliffs, this is the effective date, July 4th, 2025, on or after for all changes. Um, 83(b) elections. This is really important. 83(b) election accelerates, right? If it's vested stock that needs to vest, it accelerates the vesting to the date of grant. You only have 30 days from grant anyway. To make A-3B elections. And that's going to create a really weird situation.

Matthew Foreman [00:04:12]:
If you think about it, right, if you were granted something on July 3rd, then you made an A-3B election. Even if you made the A-3B election on July 28th, your grant date and the vesting date is July 3rd. So you get one set of rules. But if it was granted, it probably should be a statement contrary to fact. If it were granted on July 3rd, same fact pattern, but you don't make an A-3B election, every time it vests, assume it's going to be on or after July 4th, therefore, right, you get, you might get benefits from that, or it's granted on in 2026, doesn't really matter to me after you can get the newer stuff. So it's the effective date is going to create some real headaches for tax professionals, as is tradition with, again, tax bills over the last 10 years. So the first change, right, the aggregate gross receipt threshold, right, used to be $50 million of aggregate gross receipts, gross, that being ignoring debts, right? Change from $50 million to $75 million. You can grant— this situation is a really interesting one.

Matthew Foreman [00:05:10]:
Let's say that on January 1st, 2025, your aggregate gross receipts— it's not gross receipts, it's aggregate gross asset value— was $40 million. You grant some. Then on April 1st, you grant some more. But at that point, your gross asset value was $55 million. That's not QSBS stock now, right? First one was, second one is. And then you grant some more on, let's make it July 4th. All right. And now your gross asset value is $70 million.

Matthew Foreman [00:05:39]:
But that's QSBS again. That's going to be tough to do. That's going to be a challenge because what's going to happen is you're going to have companies that go out and come back in. And that does happen from time to time that values do increase, decrease. But this is like forcing it on people. I don't know. I've never really thought $50 million was all that small of a company anyway. $1,202 again, as I discussed in episodes 17, 18, 19.

Matthew Foreman [00:06:00]:
By the way, if you haven't listened to the 3 more previous ones where I talk about it, I recommend doing that first, as I'm now a couple minutes into this episode. Get a baseline of what's going on here. $2 million is still pretty generous, pretty, pretty high. So that's going to be a challenge. The second change, the second change, the tiered exclusion via shorter holding periods. This one is really kind of interesting. Basically, I'm going to go through a couple iterations. If you purchased, this is purchased, before July 4th, 2025.

Matthew Foreman [00:06:24]:
I'm just going to say July 4th. We're going to assume it's 2025. Aggregate gross asset limit $50 million. Granted and vested before July 4th, aggregate gross asset limit is $50 million. Purchased on or after July 4th, 2025, company's gross— gross aggregate gross asset limit— say that 3 times fast— $75 million. Then granted at any time but vested on or after July 4th, the aggregate gross asset limit $75 million. Again, A-3B elections are considered the time that it vests. So even if you were to grant it on July 1st, but then make the election, the A-3B election on July 28th, you make that election as of the date of grant, July 1st.

Matthew Foreman [00:07:03]:
So again, the $50 million, not $53. Awesome. No way this can backfire. None, none whatsoever. Wonderful job. All right, the next one again, and this is really important. Holding period controls for tax, not legal. So even if it doesn't vest yet, for legal purposes because 83(b) election doesn't change actual vesting schedules.

Matthew Foreman [00:07:19]:
That doesn't matter. The third change, $15 million, it was $10 million. So this is another one, $10 versus $15 million, right? So basically the way the exclusion used to work, it used to be $10 million or 10 times the basis. Now it's $15 million or 10 times the basis. Can't wait till someone comes up to me and says, no, no, it's 15 times the basis. And it's not. But again, you know, if it vests 12/31/2025, that you get $15 million. But an 83(b) election on the grant date, 1/1/2025, exclusion amount is $10 million.

Matthew Foreman [00:07:46]:
So we're going to— we're definitely going to run into a situation where stuff's going to get a little bit funky. Not very fun. Not awesome to deal with. Zero stars. Do not recommend. Curiously, I don't know if the right word is here. A lot of stuff didn't actually change, right? Stacking stuff with non-grantor trusts, nothing. Three words said, right? So Congress knows it's there.

Matthew Foreman [00:08:05]:
Congress has amended the statute in a technical way, not just to clean it up. I think that gives a lot of credence to the idea that you can do stacking. The other one, the ambiguity— these are two I discussed in episode 19— the ambiguity with the exclusion for amount, 35% to only 1% versus half. So whether you get 1% or 1% each, or you, you get, you know, half each, basically. You know what's interesting is this creates a real issue, right? Because it's either $15 million or $7.5 million or $10 million or $5.5 million. But theoretically, or $5 million, theoretically, if you go from, you know, some people say, okay, well, you know, it's $10 million to $7.5 million each, It's not actually that big of a drop-off, you know, 10 to 15, it's enough. So maybe they're splitting the baby, maybe not. You know, don't kill babies, that's bad.

Matthew Foreman [00:08:48]:
But that's the idea, right? That's what's going on. So they really didn't clean up a lot. This is going to be a mess. I actually think that this is going to get changed again sometime soon. They're going to kick up that number again. It's such a limited use. You know, I get questions about it a lot, particularly in the context of what should I do? How should I do it? What should— things like that. Should I be a C corp? Should I go after QSBS? And I always tell people that like, look, this is a pure risk tolerance question.

Matthew Foreman [00:09:13]:
Pure risk tolerance, as much as it can be. Because what a lot of people don't realize, I don't know if it's the right way to phrase it, is that QSBS is something you're chasing, right? You're chasing that you can be a C-corp, you can grow for long enough, it won't be adverse to your business to pay a whole lot of taxes because you're a C-corp, and that someone will be willing to buy the stock, right? That's the key. There's so many things that have to happen. And that's, you know, that's fine, but it's definitely something to think about. All right, we're going to take a little music break, rock out a little bit, right? And we're going to talk about deduction of R&E expenditures or amortization of R&E expenditures under Section 174. Okay, and we're back. So now we're talking about the deduction or amortization, I guess, of R&E expenditures under Section 174. History, history, history is always really important.

Matthew Foreman [00:10:12]:
History gives great context, particularly in tax. Pre-1954, it's unclear if you were to deduct it in the current year or capitalize it over a period of time, what the period was, etc., etc. And so there's litigation, how does things go in that. So as part of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, '74, Congress enacted Section 201(d)(9)(B), which is now Section 174. It allows the taxpayer to either deduct it in the current year or amortize it over a period of 60 months. Pretty straightforward. This was the case for nearly 70 years. In Public Law 115-97, Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, TCJA, it created a ticking time bomb for tax years starting in 2022.

Matthew Foreman [00:10:52]:
So not necessarily, right, for '22, because if you had like a 52-52 3-week year, might start at the end of '21. There's a whole variety of factors, right? What it did is it forced everyone into an amortization period for US-based research and expenditures, research and experimentation expenditures. It's going to call it R&D. You had to amortize it over 60 months, and that started mid-year, which is really interesting. Foreign R&D was over 180 months or 15 years. It's a heck of a time period. It became a nightmare. If you read 10-Ks, annual reports from public companies, they didn't really lament this.

Matthew Foreman [00:11:27]:
They said, oh, this is a slight— look, your tax rate went from 35% to 21%. So the net-net, we're pretty far ahead. But for small businesses, especially for pastors, man, this was a tough one. This was a really tough one because it took an expense, right? They budgeted and all of a sudden it changed. And people said, well, you know, they should have known this was going to happen. It was in the bill for a couple of years. but like, that's just not how, that's not how businesses operate, right? They like consistency year over year. Any change is a bad change, especially one that's adverse, not great.

Matthew Foreman [00:12:00]:
So, you know, nothing happens for a couple years, 22, 23, 24 years go on. Enter Public Law 119-21, OBTHRICE as I call it. US real estate, US RD, US RD doesn't change the foreign stuff, but US is 60 months. And that's really important. And it starts with the month that the R&E is expensed, right? So for book purposes, what year it actually was paid. So it could accelerate it 60 months, put it mid-year for the first year. So it was really half a year, 4 years, then half a year. So into the 6th year, this, this is a little shorter, most likely, or a little longer.

Matthew Foreman [00:12:34]:
Kind of depends on the factors. You can elect to accelerate the amortized R&E expenses all into 2025. The 60-month amortization, like I said, also starts— this is interesting— 60-month amortization, right, 5 years for tax years that begin in 2025. So it's not quite retroactive. Because we're kind of in the middle, most of the way through, but middle of 2025, I guess when they passed this bill, it was basically the dead middle point. So now people are budgeting for it. But I think it's what's going to happen is what always really happens, which is people say, oh, that's cool, it saves money. Then Congress did what Congress does, which is what's the mechanism to implement all these changes? All right.

Matthew Foreman [00:13:09]:
And a little more and different stuff that happens. Well, IRS weeks ago, maybe more by the time this airs, I should say it's released. I don't— air is definitely not the right word. The IRS issued Rev. Proc., Revenue Procedure 2005, 2025-28. I'm going to talk about that now because the mechanics are really interesting, somewhat interesting, but really important. But first, before we get to that, let's play some music. Let's rock out for a second.

Matthew Foreman [00:13:35]:
I'll be right back. All right, we're back. Let's, let's talk about Revenue Procedure 2025-28. First off, the election requires IRS Form 3115. You can elect to accelerate the amortized R&E expenses to deduct in 2025, put it all, just dump everything into '25. You can also accelerate the previously amortized expenses into 2 years, so '25 and '26. Someone asked, why would you do that? And the answer is look, if you're taking all these expenses and you drive your income below zero, that's kind of pointless to take a loss. A lot of people, this is their, you know, for example, their only source of income.

Matthew Foreman [00:14:18]:
Also, you know, if you have a business that's passive, has a lot of passive owners, getting losses won't help. R&E credits, RD credits are AMT preference items if there isn't income to offset them. So you may not want to just push yourself into loss. You want to net it out first. And that's really, really the reason for it, why it can be helpful. Just in general, you know, there's no, there's no reason to generate losses to carry forward. You can't carry them back anyway. So just generate the loss and put the loss in the next year so that you have 2 years that are better instead of carrying it forward, have more attributes on your return, add complexity.

Matthew Foreman [00:14:50]:
Kind of pointless, right? So anyway, if you're a small business, you can also retroactively apply Work Cap A. This is really important. They didn't just amend 174. If you read it now, it's a mess. If it's this, it's this. If it's that, it's that. If this happens, that happens. This happens.

Matthew Foreman [00:15:04]:
The catch-up is that. So they created— before CAFEH, they created an entire other code section. They jammed it after 174 to do it. And this is just like, this is when you need to know, like, maybe it's not necessary. I sort of had this conversation with someone, and I think that like the important thing to understand is we're, we're currently in year 4 of the 5-year cycle, right? So basically they've largely evened out. I actually don't think they need to have to catch up. I think what they should have done was just let it play out over the next couple of years and take current year expenses. Right? So you get these large deductions that are really going to help.

Matthew Foreman [00:15:35]:
I think this is just a little bit excessive. I don't think it's necessary, but I do not make rules. I definitely don't pass law, much like the IRS. I don't pass the law. So, you know, while this is definitely not the IRS code, it's definitely not Matt's code, right? My code, much simpler, much more straightforward. I'm going to tell you, 74 would exist in the immediate deduction. There'd be a lot more straight line and longer periods, a lot less bonus. So that's sort of how I view it.

Matthew Foreman [00:15:58]:
I think a lot of this acceleration is merely rate playing and pandering, and I don't think it's helpful. I would just have lower rates overall. That's how I do it. Anyway, that was, that was not on my notes to talk about, but here we are. So if you're a small business, you can retroactively apply Section 174 Cap A, which is the immediate deduction, to tax years that began in '22, '23, '24. Small business, the average gross receipts under 448C. $25 million or less, you know, it's indexed for inflation, so it's $31 million for 2025. C also deals with when you have to go, if you're familiar with it, it's generally used when you have to go from a cash to accrual basis taxpayer.

Matthew Foreman [00:16:36]:
So that's, that's where it really comes in. If you're thinking, what, what is 448C? I will admit that I was like, I think that's cash to accrual. A question I get with some level of regularity, but yeah, that's, that's, that's what it is. You can file a superseding 2024 return within 6 months, so you can actually accelerate it without need to go through like an AAR procedure or an amended return for it, which is kind of a headache. I suspect that most taxpayers are just going to dump their R&E expenses into 2025 and have zero tax. They're not going to want to do amended returns or AARs or anything else crazy. A lot are going to do— they're going to run some numbers in 2026 and they're going to decide if they want to do kind of half '25 and half '26. Again, you're taking 2025's expenses immediately.

Matthew Foreman [00:17:20]:
So I think that that's really important. To sort of go through it, run those numbers, you know, talk to your professionals. I know a lot of tax professionals, you know, listen to this. I know that there are people who run businesses who listen to this. I get emails from you sometimes. That's kind of fascinating to me that you want to hear me talk about tax, but I appreciate it. But this is definitely one where I think modeling things out is going to be helpful. And I actually think this is one where you want to sort of estimate what the number is going to be.

Matthew Foreman [00:17:44]:
My biggest fear is too strong of a word. My biggest concern is always when people are like, oh, we'll leave that to next year. And then you hit, you know, Pastor Eddie, September 3rd, and you're making this decision, right? Yeah, you can do it. Do you have to amend returns? How do you do it? The superseding 2024 return must be filed within 6 months of when you actually filed it. So if you, you know, extended it, you're kind of there. If otherwise, you're a little late on getting it done. So that, that's really it. I want to do this one.

Matthew Foreman [00:18:12]:
It's a little shorter of a one. I don't always know how long they're going to be for one really specific reason. The music gets edited in later. So I actually don't know how long these are, but this is a little shorter of one. But I thought it'd be a good one to do. I thought it'd be interesting. And we're going to roll next one. Next one's a little more, well, probably technically less substantive, but I think it's pretty substantive mechanically.

Matthew Foreman [00:18:32]:
So that was the 38th episode of How Tax Works. Hope you learned something. Hope you enjoyed it. Back in 2 weeks, 39th episode. I'm going to talk about what to do if you get audited. I'm going to talk about state audits, federal audits, a few other sort of things. What happens if you get audited? By municipalities, right? You know, I live in New York City, so I get audited by the state, by federal government, by the city. I don't think the borough of Manhattan itself audits.

Matthew Foreman [00:18:57]:
I think that's just New York City as a sort of general proposition. But those do exist, right? There are local income taxes that Department of Finance, New York State Department of Finance would audit on. And that kind of stuff's interesting. They're always different. There's different kind of auditors. They're looking for different things. Always a lot of factors. I hope you enjoyed this.

Matthew Foreman [00:19:12]:
And now let's get some music in there. Have a good one. Thank you for listening. always does, which is what's the mechanism to implement all these changes. All right. And a little more and different stuff that happens. Well, IRS weeks ago, maybe more by the time this airs, I should say it's released. I don't— air is definitely not the right word.

Matthew Foreman [00:26:42]:
The IRS issued Rev Proc, Revenue Procedure 2025-28. I'm going to talk about that now because the mechanics are really interesting, somewhat interesting, but really important. But first, before we get to that, let's, let's, let's play some music. Let's rock out for a second. I'll be right back. All right. We're back. Let's, let's talk about Revenue Procedure 2025-28.

Matthew Foreman [00:27:03]:
First off, the election requires IRS Form 31- 15. You can elect to accelerate the amortized R&E expenses to deduct in 2025. Put it all, just dump everything into '25. You can also accelerate the previously amortized expenses into 2 years, so '25 and '26. Someone asked, why would you do that? And the answer is, look, if you're taking all these expenses, if you drive your income below zero, that's kind of pointless to take a loss. A lot of people, this is their, you know, for example, their only source of income. Also, you know, if you have a business pass-through has a lot of passive owners, getting losses won't help. R&E credits, RD credits are AMT preference items if there isn't income to offset them.

Matthew Foreman [00:27:41]:
So you may not want to just push yourself into loss. You want to net it out first. And that's really, really the reason for it, why it can be helpful. Just in general, you know, there's no reason to generate losses to carry forward. You can't carry them back anyway. So just generate the loss and put the loss in the next year so that you have 2 years that are better instead of carrying it forward, have more attributes on your return at complexity. Kind of pointless, right? So anyway, if you're a small business, you can also retroactively apply Work Cap A. This is really important.

Matthew Foreman [00:28:09]:
They didn't just amend 174. If you read it now, it's a mess. If it's this, it's this. If it's that, it's that. If this happens, that happens. This happens. This is the catch-up. Is that— so they created— before Cap A, they created an entire other code section.

Matthew Foreman [00:28:21]:
They jammed it after 174 to do it. And this is just like, this is when you need to know, like, maybe it's not necessary. I sort of had this conversation with someone. And I think that like the important thing to understand is we're, we're currently in year 4 of the 5-year cycle, right? So basically, they've largely evened out. I actually don't think they need to have to catch up. I think what they should have done was just let it play out over the next couple years and take current year expensing, right? So you get these large deductions that are really going to help. I think this is just a little bit excessive. I don't think it's necessary.

Matthew Foreman [00:28:50]:
But I do not make rules. I definitely don't pass law, much like the IRS. I don't pass the law. So you know, while this is is definitely not the IRS code. It's definitely not Matt's code, right? My code, much simpler, much more straightforward. I'm going to tell you, 74 would exist in the, in the immediate deduction. There'd be a lot more straight line and longer periods, a lot less bonus. So that's sort of how I view it.

Matthew Foreman [00:29:11]:
I think a lot of this acceleration is merely rate playing and pandering, and I don't think it's helpful. I would just have lower rates overall. That's how I do it. Anyway, that was, that was not on my notes to talk about, but here we are. So if you're a small business, you can retroactively apply Section 174 Cap A, which is the immediate deduction, to tax years that began in '22, '23, '24. Small business, the average gross receipts under 448C, $25 million or less. You know, it's indexed for inflation, so it's $31 million for 2025. C also deals with when you have to go, if you're familiar with it, it's generally used when you have to go from a cash to accrual basis taxpayer.

Matthew Foreman [00:29:48]:
So that's, that's where it really comes in. If you're thinking, what, what is 448C? I will admit that I was like, I think that's cash to accrual. The question I get with some level of regularity. But yeah, that's, that's, that's what it is. You can file a superseding 2024 return within 6 months, so you can actually accelerate it without need to go through like an AAR procedure or an amended return for it, which is kind of a headache. I suspect that most taxpayers are just going to dump their R&E expenses into 2025 and have zero tax. They're not going to want to do amended returns or AARs or anything else crazy. A lot are going to do— they're going to run some numbers in 2026.

Matthew Foreman [00:30:25]:
and they're going to decide if they want to do kind of half 25 and half 26. Again, you're taking 2025's expenses immediately. So I think that that's really important to sort of go through and run those numbers, you know, talk, talk to your professionals. I know a lot of tax professionals, you know, listen to this. I know that there are people who run businesses who listen to this. I get emails from you sometimes. That's kind of fascinating to me that you want to hear me talk about tax, but I appreciate it. But this is definitely one where I think modeling things out is going to be helpful.

Matthew Foreman [00:30:51]:
I actually think this is one where you want to sort of estimate what the number is going to be. My biggest fear is too strong of a word. My biggest concern is always when people are like, oh, we'll leave that to next year. And then you hit, you know, past the remedy, September 3rd, and you're making this decision, right? Yeah, you can do it. Do you have to amend returns? How do you do it? The superseding 2024 return must be filed within 6 months of when you actually filed it. So if you extended it, you're kind of there. If otherwise, you're a little late on getting it done. So that's really it.

Matthew Foreman [00:31:24]:
I want to do this one. It's a little shorter of a one. I don't always know how long they're going to be for one really specific reason. The music gets edited in later. So I actually don't know how long these are, but this is a little shorter of one. But I thought it'd be a good one to do. I thought it'd be interesting. And we're going to roll next one.

Matthew Foreman [00:31:39]:
Next one's a little more, well, probably technically less substantive, but I think it's pretty substantive mechanically. So that was the 38th episode of How Tax Works. Hope you learned something. Hope you enjoyed it. Back in 2 weeks, 39th episode, I'm going to talk about what to do if you get audited. I'm going to talk about state audits, federal audits, a few other sort of things. What happens if you get audited by municipalities, right? You know, I live in New York City, so I can get audited by the state, by federal government, by the city. I don't think the borough of Manhattan itself audits.

Matthew Foreman [00:32:10]:
I think that's just New York City as a sort of general proposition. But those do exist, right? There are local income taxes that Department of Finance, New York State Department of Finance would audit on. And that kind of stuff's interesting. They're always different. There's different kind of auditors. They're looking for different things. Always a lot of factors. I hope you enjoyed this, and now let's, let's get some music in there.

Matthew Foreman [00:32:26]:
Have a good one. Thank you for listening.